• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ Çмú´ëȸ > KCC 2021

KCC 2021

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ÀǷ῵»ó ºÐ·ù¸¦ À§ÇÑ °Å¸®±â¹Ý ¸ÞÆ®¸¯ ¼Õ½ÇÀÇ ºñ±³
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Comparison of Distance-Based Metric Losses for Medical Image Classification
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ±â¹Ì¸£ ·¯¸¸   ÀÌ»ó¿õ   Raman Ghimire   Sang-Woong Lee  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 48 NO. 01 PP. 0657 ~ 0658 (2021. 06)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
Distance metric learning has been used as an effective strategy to learn intrinsic pattern of the image datasets across various computer vision domain. In this paper, we compare 3 different types of loss functions: pair-based loss (Triplet loss, Soft-Triple loss) and proxy-based loss (Proxy-NCA, Proxy-Anchor) in a multi-class classification task. We have used resnet-50 as network architecture and our result shows that Proxy-Anchor loss achieved 93.44% mean average precision on average compared to the Triplet loss, SoftTriple Loss and Proxy-NCA loss which achieved 92.53%, 93.63% and 91.98% respectively.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) Medical Image Classification   Triplet Loss   Soft-Triple Loss   Proxy-NCA Loss   Proxy-Anchor Loss  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå